A few days ago, I learned of the death of Mr. Peter David, the Washington editor of The Economist. I didn’t post about it here because it was Mother’s Day Weekend, my mother-in-law and I were here celebrating my first Mother’s Day with our darling daughter and granddaughter – and I just thought the weekend could stand as it was meant to be: a happy time.
Now that I head back to work, however – it seems appropriate to recognize Mr. David. He was a wonderful example in my profession.
I met Peter David many years ago, when he came to our U.S. European Headquarters for a meeting with our deputy commander – at the time, a four-star Air Force general. He was hosted very well, and I remember him being a bit bemused by the “rock star” treatment. He took a lot of notes, asked a lot of very intelligent questions, and didn’t do a lot of small talk. I was singularly impressed.
After that meeting, John and I became subscribers to The Economist. (Did you know that it is actually a “newspaper” as opposed to a magazine? Yep, it’s true. For historical reasons, despite being published on glossy magazine paper, the publication is technically a newspaper.) We have been loyal readers since, and I refer to it as the gold-standard in journalism. There are no by-lines, you can count on its sources and the photo captions are wickedly funny. I credit Mr. David as the reason I have a weekly appointment with “The Week Ahead” – a newscast devoted to the biggest stories coming up and The Economist‘s editors’ predictions for their strategic meaning. I also read the publication cover-to-cover…it’s a never-fail source of (sometimes) opposing viewpoints and arguments – always good to read.
Mr. David was only 60. He left behind a wife and children, and his wife was in the car accident that claimed his life (he was the only casualty of the four in the car).
He’s gone too soon, and I will miss his weekly column and insight. His talent as a newsman was expressed very well here, by the newspaper’s media editor in New York, Mr. Gideon Lichfield:
“Peter was a great journalist in the best British tradition. Utterly self-effacing, he liked to wander the corridors pretending he had nothing to do and didn’t really understand anything anyway; but he could take the murkiest issue, see clear through to the other side of it, and write a withering but never vicious critique in prose of wonderful balance and wit. His legacy is a lesson too often forgotten: that it is possible to take the world seriously without taking oneself too seriously in the process.”
I really love Lichfield’s last line – an excellent maxim for a life spent at this profession. It’s always a useful thing to recognize that no matter how “good” you think you are, it is never (and should never be) about you. In these days of celebrity-style media correspondents who really only seem to listen to each other, his character and professionalism stood firm as an example of true and thoughtful reporting, a type of journalism that is fast disappearing.














